Presently, the banned apps are planning to formally represent their concerns before Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, explaining who the benefactors for data they collect are
TikTok has denied any plans to explore legal avenues against ban imposed by the Government of India. The response came after media reports claimed that the video sharing platform is considering legal options to challenge government’s ban in courts.
“There have been statements in the press concerning the possibility that TikTok might pursue legal action regarding the directive by the Government of India. We have no plans to pursue such action,” a spokesperson from the company said. “We are committed to working with the government to address its concerns. We comply with the laws and regulations of the Government of India. Ensuring the data sovereignty, security and privacy of our users has always been and will continue to be a top priority for us.”
Indian government had banned 59 Chinese app, including ByteDance’s TikTok and Helo, along with other popular titles like UC Browser, CamScanner and WeChat citing threat to country’s sovereignty and security. Presently, these apps are planning to formally represent their concerns before Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). However, some media reports quoted people familiar with the matter that a writ petition was the last resort for number of these apps if the ban is not lifted even after the representations.
“First they want to clarify the data security concerns to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. Some representations have already been made. Writ will be the last resort if nothing else works” Livemint quoted one of the two people mentioned above.
“The basic two questions being raised by MeitY are firstly the requirement of sharing user data with Chinese government. How many times such requests were raised and how many times were they complied with. Second lack of physical presence in India,” he added.
The report quoted a third lawyer, who represents multiple apps in the banned list, as saying that since the companies do not have any knowledge of what grounds the government has banned them on, they are considering sharing data flow diagrams, which explains who the benefactors for data they collect are. They may even submit to audits by companies empanelled by CERT-In.
China’s laws require companies originating in the country to share user data, collected from across the world if requested by Chinese government or intelligence agencies.